

Discover more from Political Junkie
Can We Get Back to Politics, Please?
Covid-19 is an ongoing tragedy--and it's time to get back to the business of taking our country back
We at Public Seminar are picking ourselves up off the floor after the closure of our university and 100,000 deaths from Covid-19. It’s time to return to the political crisis that the virus interrupted.
The Democratic administration we hope for in November will have to address the wreck that the Trump administration has made of our country. But voters also need to insist that a new President and Congress rectify older wrongs. In the last week, social media has revealed two more grisly incidents of American racism. On Memorial Day weekend, in New York City’s Central Park, Amy Cooper set off a social media storm by calling the police on a stranger. African-American birdwatcher Christian Cooper had asked her to leash a dog illegally running off-lead. Worse, the white consultant repeatedly lied to a 911 operator, claiming that the nature enthusiast, now recording her with his phone, had threatened her with violence.
It is no secret in New York, or anywhere else, that making an African-American person into a police suspect can be lethal for the person targeted. Christian Cooper survived — but in Minneapolis, 46-year-old George Floyd did not. On Tuesday, a video surfaced showing a handcuffed Floyd choking to death. A policeman kneeled on Floyd’s neck while other officers watched, bystanders begged them to stop, and Floyd gasped the iconic words: “I can’t breathe.”
Minneapolis is burning as we write.
Covid-19 had seemed to stop the world — but of course, it didn’t. It’s the same world: we know because we can smell the smoke and hear the rattle of breath escaping a crushed windpipe. So we recommit to politics with our first special issue, taking a long look at a multi-racial social movement determined to create change in the face of a party system that has done little to stop state violence: Democratic Socialists of America (DSA).

Members of the Democratic Socialists of America march at the Occupy Wall Street protest in New York. Photo: David Shankbone, Wikimedia Commons.
Co-executive editor James Miller sets the stage by taking us back to February 29, 2020, as Covid-19 was slipping silently past Trump’s border guards in California and New York. After over a year of campaigning, and with two mostly white states endorsing socialist Bernie Sanders, African-American Democrats in South Carolina rallied behind former Vice President Joe Biden. Subsequently, Biden ran the table on Super Tuesday, and Sanders partisans saw the Democratic nomination that had barely eluded them in 2016 swirling the drain.
It was a stunning disappointment for DSA, Sanders’ best-organized constituency, but the organization was ready. We asked Andrew Sernatinger, author of a motion passed at the 2019 DSA convention that resolved not to endorse any candidate but Sanders, to dive deeply into that decision. Sociologist Robert Ross, a DSA member, picks up the story there to illuminate the conversation that he and fellow Students for a Democratic Society veterans had about what they saw as another, potentially disastrous schism on the left. The result was a letter, from one generation of socialists to another, originally printed at The Nation and reprinted here by permission.
As Jacobin editor Bhaskar Sunkara wrote in the New York Times, 88% of Sanders’ voters voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016, and they are likely to vote for Biden too. But, as Honda Wang points out, DSA is invested in grassroots democracy, not brokered, political alliances: read this essay to understand the socialist path to power as these organizers understand it. Annie Levin agrees with Wang: why should a vibrant and growing organization that has managed to unite many tendencies on the left endorse Biden when neither he or the Democratic Party shares those values?
We called on other DSA members to provide a counter-argument, and they agreed. Economist Max Sawicky endorses the principles of the resolution—but believes the stakes are too high not to support a Democratic victory in November actively. Sarah Newman, a former Green Party organizer, closes out this cluster by reflecting on the consequences of her support for Ralph Nader in the 2000 election.
We were happy to get back to politics. But we also know that politics are happening elsewhere than the United States. Mark Frazier, co-director of the India China Institute at The New School, returns us to Hong Kong, where the Chinese Communist Party is on the brink of ending any semblance of self-rule for that territory. And we end this week’s offerings with the fourth installment of “Sentencing the Present,” a reflection on critical thought in the time of Covid-19, curated by Jonathon Catlin and Benjamin P. Davis.
This virus will be with us for a long time. We at Public Seminar will continue to talk to you about it. But now we are getting back to politics.
Can We Get Back to Politics, Please?
While totally supporting progressive politics, the title here belies your aim. When will the Left understand that all health is political under capitalism. This current event is a political contrivance. Anyone watching what is really happening can see how the public has been manipulated with fear mongering, professionally done, into a state of fear and subservience. This is nothing but a game of using numbers to scare people. But those numbers are fake. They are distorted and taken out of context to create a sense of being overwhelmed with death. However, the number of deaths from this alleged virus are less than the annual flu. Hospitals are not overwhelmed. They are barely being used while patients are put on hold for other conditions. Many deaths are most likely due to patients not getting care and/or being stressed into states of disease. The CDC itself, in writing to medical facilities directs them to declare deaths as from C-19 when only a mere suspicion of contact is there. This is called cooking the books; ie, scientific fraud. It is making more money for hospitals that make this declaration than simply saying the 85 yr old died of cancer, stage 4 or coronary disease which was chronic for them.
The political push is to destroy all holistic and cheaper forms of healing, including hydroxychloroquin. Trump always sounds like an idiot but once in awhile he manages to say something with truth, even if by accident. That is no reason to ignore it--truth is truth no matter where we get it. But many doctors are using it for prophylaxis and healing very successfully, especially when paired with zinc. Actually zinc may be the real healer and the drug just being the carrier of the zinc into the cells of the body. FYI, zinc needs a carrier for it be taken in. Better yet, Quercetin, an OTC, supplement works just as well, is cheaper and easily accessible.
Not to go on longer, health is always political and should be looked at in this context. Our health is being bargained with for the increased power of the drug industry. And Bill Gates along with his eugenicist buddy Fauci stand to make fortunes off their vaccine investments, vaccines that will not work, will cause disease and even death. More frightening is the fact that Gates plans to insert an electronic tatoo/chip in the vaccine so he can track every person on earth for vaccine compliance. He proposes using this for total surveillance of people's lives including mandating up do date registry on vaccines to even get your license renewed.
Yes, some say this is nuts, but that is what these people are up to doing to us if we don't pay attention and fight back. There is nothing more personal than our body and we allow industry to commoditize us for profit and power and we do nothing except stick out our arms without any knowledge of what will come. Yes, health is political. This C-19 event is totally political. It is a political contrivance and needs to be seen that way and analyzed as such.