5 Comments

So, as one who hasn't read Gender Trouble and indeed is hesitant to consider sacrificing time on it, what I've surmised in reading other's accounts of the book is that the essential message is that "gender is performative" and that gender identity "is not intrinsic". I wouldn't have any trouble with these statements, they seem to square quite neatly with my own thinking on the subject, but how then in a short space of 15 to 20 years have we got from there to a sacrament more or less which openly and contrarily declares gender identity to be precisely intrinsic, and which has become so sacred that you can lose your job for daring to challenge it? And moreover which Butler has been given the credit for bringing about? I can't make sense of this.

Expand full comment

Yeah, the journal Rethinking Marxism was informed by a postmodern reading of Marx which centered the production distribution & redistributions of the Social Surplus.

Expand full comment

Dear Prof Potter/Claire, Marxist & feminist economics were also deeply affected by Judith Butler’s decentered subject. Susan

Expand full comment